Review



geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b
    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Geps Oligonucleotide Microarrays U133a & U133b, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Tumor Biology Hides Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Narrative Review"

    Article Title: Tumor Biology Hides Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Narrative Review

    Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

    doi: 10.3390/ijms252111384

    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Microarray, Translocation Assay, Amplification, Selection, RNA Sequencing Assay, Activity Assay, DNA Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Activation Assay, Sequencing, Functional Assay, Binding Assay



    Similar Products

    90
    Thermo Fisher geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b
    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Geps Oligonucleotide Microarrays U133a & U133b, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    geps oligonucleotide microarrays u133a & u133b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Thermo Fisher transcriptome microarray gep
    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Transcriptome Microarray Gep, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/transcriptome microarray gep/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    transcriptome microarray gep - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher gep microarrays
    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Gep Microarrays, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gep microarrays/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gep microarrays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher microarray gep
    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.
    Microarray Gep, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray gep/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray gep - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Illumina Inc gep microarray analysis
    Distinct <t>gene</t> <t>expression</t> <t>profile</t> and enrichment of stem cells signature identified in diagnostic MNCs from patients who failed to achieve EMR. (A) The workflow of our study with regard to the discovery process, including samples from patients with EMR failure (n = 13) vs EMR achievement (n = 83), as defined by BCR-ABL1 percentage at 3 months. (B) Volcano plot demonstrating the effect of log2 fold change (FC) on the x-axis vs −log10 P value on the y-axis. Red circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > 0.6) with increased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. Green circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC < −0.6) with decreased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. (C) Heatmap demonstrating the distinct gene expression patterns based on all significant probes (n = 502; FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > |0.6|). Orange represents increased gene expression level, and blue represents decreased gene expression level. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package. (D) GSEA indicates enrichment of stem cell signaling, cell cycle, and immune response/T lymphocytes in the EMR failure patient samples (BCR-ABL1 >10% IS at 3 months) compared with the EMR achievement patient samples (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% IS at 3 months). Blue bars represent cell cycle–related data sets. Red bars represent stem cell–related data sets. Green bars represent immune response/T lymphocyte–related signatures. Regarding normalized enrichment score (NES), positive score indicates positive enrichment in samples from patients who failed to achieve EMR, and negative score indicates enrichment in samples from patients who achieved EMR. (E) Boxplot displaying the differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly higher percentage in the samples collected from patients who failed to achieve EMR. Only 91 patients had differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. (F) Boxplot displaying the lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly lower percentage in the EMR failure patient sample group. Only 94 patients had lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
    Gep Microarray Analysis, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gep microarray analysis/product/Illumina Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gep microarray analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Biomark Inc microarray gep
    Distinct <t>gene</t> <t>expression</t> <t>profile</t> and enrichment of stem cells signature identified in diagnostic MNCs from patients who failed to achieve EMR. (A) The workflow of our study with regard to the discovery process, including samples from patients with EMR failure (n = 13) vs EMR achievement (n = 83), as defined by BCR-ABL1 percentage at 3 months. (B) Volcano plot demonstrating the effect of log2 fold change (FC) on the x-axis vs −log10 P value on the y-axis. Red circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > 0.6) with increased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. Green circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC < −0.6) with decreased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. (C) Heatmap demonstrating the distinct gene expression patterns based on all significant probes (n = 502; FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > |0.6|). Orange represents increased gene expression level, and blue represents decreased gene expression level. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package. (D) GSEA indicates enrichment of stem cell signaling, cell cycle, and immune response/T lymphocytes in the EMR failure patient samples (BCR-ABL1 >10% IS at 3 months) compared with the EMR achievement patient samples (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% IS at 3 months). Blue bars represent cell cycle–related data sets. Red bars represent stem cell–related data sets. Green bars represent immune response/T lymphocyte–related signatures. Regarding normalized enrichment score (NES), positive score indicates positive enrichment in samples from patients who failed to achieve EMR, and negative score indicates enrichment in samples from patients who achieved EMR. (E) Boxplot displaying the differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly higher percentage in the samples collected from patients who failed to achieve EMR. Only 91 patients had differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. (F) Boxplot displaying the lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly lower percentage in the EMR failure patient sample group. Only 94 patients had lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
    Microarray Gep, supplied by Biomark Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray gep/product/Biomark Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray gep - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Genotypic Technology Pvt Ltd microarray analysis for gene expression profiling (gep)
    Distinct <t>gene</t> <t>expression</t> <t>profile</t> and enrichment of stem cells signature identified in diagnostic MNCs from patients who failed to achieve EMR. (A) The workflow of our study with regard to the discovery process, including samples from patients with EMR failure (n = 13) vs EMR achievement (n = 83), as defined by BCR-ABL1 percentage at 3 months. (B) Volcano plot demonstrating the effect of log2 fold change (FC) on the x-axis vs −log10 P value on the y-axis. Red circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > 0.6) with increased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. Green circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC < −0.6) with decreased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. (C) Heatmap demonstrating the distinct gene expression patterns based on all significant probes (n = 502; FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > |0.6|). Orange represents increased gene expression level, and blue represents decreased gene expression level. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package. (D) GSEA indicates enrichment of stem cell signaling, cell cycle, and immune response/T lymphocytes in the EMR failure patient samples (BCR-ABL1 >10% IS at 3 months) compared with the EMR achievement patient samples (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% IS at 3 months). Blue bars represent cell cycle–related data sets. Red bars represent stem cell–related data sets. Green bars represent immune response/T lymphocyte–related signatures. Regarding normalized enrichment score (NES), positive score indicates positive enrichment in samples from patients who failed to achieve EMR, and negative score indicates enrichment in samples from patients who achieved EMR. (E) Boxplot displaying the differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly higher percentage in the samples collected from patients who failed to achieve EMR. Only 91 patients had differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. (F) Boxplot displaying the lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly lower percentage in the EMR failure patient sample group. Only 94 patients had lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
    Microarray Analysis For Gene Expression Profiling (Gep), supplied by Genotypic Technology Pvt Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray analysis for gene expression profiling (gep)/product/Genotypic Technology Pvt Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray analysis for gene expression profiling (gep) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.

    Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

    Article Title: Tumor Biology Hides Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Narrative Review

    doi: 10.3390/ijms252111384

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of DLBCL.

    Article Snippet: , Monti et al., 2005. [ ] , , OxPhos , cluster signatures: NADH dehydrogenase complex, COX complex, ATP synthase (mitochondrial), ATP binding protein, ATP binding cassette subfamily, ATPase H+ transporter, TIMM, BFL-1/A1, MIHC, TNFA1P8, FAS, apoptosis-related protein 3, proteasome subunits, PTEN, etc. , , , , , three unsupervised clustering algorithms were used and compared: hierarchical clustering, self-organizing maps & model-based probabilistic clustering , GEPs by oligonucleotide microarrays (Affymetrix U133A & U133B) containing probe sets from 33,000 genes, FISH, morphologic analysis of TILs, IHC , DLBCL specimen from 176 patients , increased incidence of t(14;18) in OxPhos tumors; BCR/proliferation cluster had more abundant expression of cell-cycle regulatory genes, increased expression of DNA repair genes and p53, higher levels of many components of the BCR signaling cascade (CD19, Ig, CD79a, BLK, SYK, PLCγ2, MAP4K), additional B-cell–specific or essential TFs; the HR cluster was extensively studied: increased expression of T/NK cell receptor and activation pathway components, complement cascade members, macrophage/DC markers & inflammatory mediators; shared features of histologically defined T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma, including fewer genetic abnormalities.

    Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, Translocation Assay, Amplification, Selection, RNA Sequencing Assay, Activity Assay, DNA Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Activation Assay, Sequencing, Functional Assay, Binding Assay

    Distinct gene expression profile and enrichment of stem cells signature identified in diagnostic MNCs from patients who failed to achieve EMR. (A) The workflow of our study with regard to the discovery process, including samples from patients with EMR failure (n = 13) vs EMR achievement (n = 83), as defined by BCR-ABL1 percentage at 3 months. (B) Volcano plot demonstrating the effect of log2 fold change (FC) on the x-axis vs −log10 P value on the y-axis. Red circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > 0.6) with increased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. Green circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC < −0.6) with decreased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. (C) Heatmap demonstrating the distinct gene expression patterns based on all significant probes (n = 502; FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > |0.6|). Orange represents increased gene expression level, and blue represents decreased gene expression level. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package. (D) GSEA indicates enrichment of stem cell signaling, cell cycle, and immune response/T lymphocytes in the EMR failure patient samples (BCR-ABL1 >10% IS at 3 months) compared with the EMR achievement patient samples (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% IS at 3 months). Blue bars represent cell cycle–related data sets. Red bars represent stem cell–related data sets. Green bars represent immune response/T lymphocyte–related signatures. Regarding normalized enrichment score (NES), positive score indicates positive enrichment in samples from patients who failed to achieve EMR, and negative score indicates enrichment in samples from patients who achieved EMR. (E) Boxplot displaying the differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly higher percentage in the samples collected from patients who failed to achieve EMR. Only 91 patients had differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. (F) Boxplot displaying the lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly lower percentage in the EMR failure patient sample group. Only 94 patients had lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

    Journal: Blood Advances

    Article Title: Gene expression signature that predicts early molecular response failure in chronic-phase CML patients on frontline imatinib

    doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000195

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Distinct gene expression profile and enrichment of stem cells signature identified in diagnostic MNCs from patients who failed to achieve EMR. (A) The workflow of our study with regard to the discovery process, including samples from patients with EMR failure (n = 13) vs EMR achievement (n = 83), as defined by BCR-ABL1 percentage at 3 months. (B) Volcano plot demonstrating the effect of log2 fold change (FC) on the x-axis vs −log10 P value on the y-axis. Red circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > 0.6) with increased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. Green circles indicate significant genes (FDR P < .05 and log2 FC < −0.6) with decreased gene expression in the EMR failure patient group. (C) Heatmap demonstrating the distinct gene expression patterns based on all significant probes (n = 502; FDR P < .05 and log2 FC > |0.6|). Orange represents increased gene expression level, and blue represents decreased gene expression level. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package. (D) GSEA indicates enrichment of stem cell signaling, cell cycle, and immune response/T lymphocytes in the EMR failure patient samples (BCR-ABL1 >10% IS at 3 months) compared with the EMR achievement patient samples (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% IS at 3 months). Blue bars represent cell cycle–related data sets. Red bars represent stem cell–related data sets. Green bars represent immune response/T lymphocyte–related signatures. Regarding normalized enrichment score (NES), positive score indicates positive enrichment in samples from patients who failed to achieve EMR, and negative score indicates enrichment in samples from patients who achieved EMR. (E) Boxplot displaying the differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly higher percentage in the samples collected from patients who failed to achieve EMR. Only 91 patients had differential blast percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. (F) Boxplot displaying the lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis, indicating a significantly lower percentage in the EMR failure patient sample group. Only 94 patients had lymphocyte percentage counts at diagnosis information available for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

    Article Snippet: 27 , 28 GEP microarray analysis Genome-wide GEP was performed using the Illumina Human HT-12v4 platform (containing 47 323 probes) at the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, VIC, Australia).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Diagnostic Assay, Generated, Biomarker Discovery, MANN-WHITNEY